Abstract
This paper draws attention to new complexities of deploying artificial intelligence (AI) to sensitive contexts, such as welfare allocation. AI is increasingly used in public administration with the promise of improving decision-making through predictive modelling. To accurately predict, it needs all the agreed criteria used as part of decisions, formal and informal. This paper empirically explores the informal classifications used by caseworkers to make unemployed welfare seekers 'fit' into the formal categories applied in a Danish job centre. Our findings show that these classifications are documentable, and hence traceable to AI. However, to the caseworkers, they are at odds with the stable explanations assumed by any bureaucratic recording system as they involve negotiated and situated judgments of people's character. Thus, for moral reasons, caseworkers find them ill-suited for formal representation and predictive …
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 102 |
Journal | Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction - CSCW |
Volume | 5 |
Issue number | CSCW1 |
Pages (from-to) | 1 |
Number of pages | 26 |
ISSN | 2573-0142 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 22 Apr 2021 |
Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence
- Welfare Allocation
- Public Administration
- Predictive Modelling
- Informal Classifications