Abstract
This chapter examines the increasing role of experimentation in transforming urban planning toward sustainability and focuses on the planning bureaucracy as a site of such experimentation. We argue that planning bureaucracies, which create representations of urban reality through maps, statistics and models, should be viewed as essential sites of experimentation. Using Copenhagen's planning for urban nature and cycling as case studies, we show how bureaucratic knowledge is often narrow and selective. Producing alternative knowledge within these bureaucracies can nevertheless significantly alter established planning practices. Thus, planning bureaucracies are not just stakeholders in urban experimentation but experimental sites where new knowledge formats and urban representations are tested and modified to address contemporary sustainability challenges better.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Planning for Urban Sustainability : Doctrines, Disciplines, and Practices |
| Editors | Malene Freudendal-Pedersen, Daniel Galland, jens Iuel-Stissing |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing |
| Publication date | 19 Jun 2025 |
| Pages | 187–199 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781035347476 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781035347483 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 19 Jun 2025 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Knowledge production
- Urban sustainability
- Experiment
- Planning bureaucracy
- Urban nature
- Cycling policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Urban experimentation and bureaucratic urban politics in planning for urban sustainability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver