Reserve your judgment on “Draconian” Chinese video gaming restrictions on children • Commentary on: Draconian policy measures are unlikely to prevent disordered gaming (Colder Carras et al., 2021)

Research output: Journal Article or Conference Article in JournalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

Abstract

China imposed strict restrictions on young people's participation in videogaming from September 2021. Colder Carras et al.'s commentary (2021) referred to this policy as ‘draconian,’ i.e., ‘excessively harsh and severe.’ However, any opinion on whether this policy is ‘draconian’ is a value judgment, and any judgment on its ‘effectiveness’ ought to be reserved until proven or disproven by empirical evidence. Indeed, the Chinese policy is neither potentially ineffective nor draconian, and is already providing at least one identifiable benefit: enhancing consumer protection by effectively reducing underage players' monetary spending on videogames, including on randomised, gambling-like mechanics known as ‘loot boxes.’
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Behavioral Addictions
ISSN2062-5871
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 May 2022

Keywords

  • China
  • videogaming restrictions
  • youth policy
  • consumer protection
  • loot boxes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reserve your judgment on “Draconian” Chinese video gaming restrictions on children • Commentary on: Draconian policy measures are unlikely to prevent disordered gaming (Colder Carras et al., 2021)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this