Abstract
This paper begins by offering a feminist reading of the visible increase in design
research within the category of “women’s health”. A critical feminist reading of
menstrual cycle tracking technologies is then used to investigate how the way that we frame design problems influences the artifacts produced and their impact within society. I argue that by re-framing design problems from the perspective of third and fourth wave feminism we can develop women’s health technologies that are more affirmative, inclusive and which celebrate difference and reflect the complexity around what it means to be a woman in today’s society. I illustrate the potential of this reframing by presenting three approaches to the design of menstrual tracking technologies that better adhere to current feminist ideologies.
research within the category of “women’s health”. A critical feminist reading of
menstrual cycle tracking technologies is then used to investigate how the way that we frame design problems influences the artifacts produced and their impact within society. I argue that by re-framing design problems from the perspective of third and fourth wave feminism we can develop women’s health technologies that are more affirmative, inclusive and which celebrate difference and reflect the complexity around what it means to be a woman in today’s society. I illustrate the potential of this reframing by presenting three approaches to the design of menstrual tracking technologies that better adhere to current feminist ideologies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of DRS2018 Design Research Society International Conference |
| Publisher | Design Research Society |
| Publication date | 25 Jun 2018 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-912294-17-6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 25 Jun 2018 |
Keywords
- feminist design
- women’s health
- menstrual cycle tracking
- third wave feminism
- inclusive technology