Pupil Center as a Function of Pupil Diameter

Zaheer Ahmed; Diako Mardanbegi; Dan Witzner Hansen

doi:10.1145/2857491.2857536

Pupil Center as a Function of Pupil Diameter

Zaheer Ahmed, Diako Mardanbegi, Dan Witzner Hansen

Research output: Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Abstract

We investigate the gaze estimation error induced by pupil size changes using simulated data. We investigate the influence of pupil diameter changes on estimated gaze point error obtained by two gaze estimation models. Simulation data show that at wider viewing angles and at small eye-camera distances, error increases with increasing pupil sizes. The maximum error recorded for refracted pupil images is 2.4° of visual angle and 1.5° for non-refracted pupil projections.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	ETRA '16 Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications
Number of pages	4
Publisher	Association for Computing Machinery
Publication date	14 Mar 2016
Pages	283-286
ISBN (Print)	978-1-4503-4125-7
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1145/2857491.2857536
Publication status	Published - 14 Mar 2016

Keywords

image processing, eye tracking, gaze estimation, pupildynamics, human computer interaction

Access to Document

10.1145/2857491.2857536

Pupil Center as a Function of Pupil DiameterAccepted author manuscript, 422 KBLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

@inproceedings{bb40de6e179d4c30953720e60c8a0587,

title = "Pupil Center as a Function of Pupil Diameter",

abstract = "We investigate the gaze estimation error induced by pupil size changes using simulated data. We investigate the influence of pupil diameter changes on estimated gaze point error obtained by two gaze estimation models. Simulation data show that at wider viewing angles and at small eye-camera distances, error increases with increasing pupil sizes. The maximum error recorded for refracted pupil images is 2.4° of visual angle and 1.5° for non-refracted pupil projections.",

keywords = "image processing, eye tracking, gaze estimation, pupildynamics, human computer interaction, image processing, eye tracking, gaze estimation, pupildynamics, human computer interaction",

author = "Zaheer Ahmed and Diako Mardanbegi and Hansen, {Dan Witzner}",

year = "2016",

month = mar,

day = "14",

doi = "10.1145/2857491.2857536",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-4503-4125-7",

pages = "283--286",

booktitle = "ETRA '16 Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications",

publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",

address = "United States",

}

Pupil Center as a Function of Pupil Diameter. / Ahmed, Zaheer; Mardanbegi, Diako; Hansen, Dan Witzner.
ETRA '16 Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications. Association for Computing Machinery, 2016. p. 283-286.

Research output: Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Pupil Center as a Function of Pupil Diameter

AU - Ahmed, Zaheer

AU - Mardanbegi, Diako

AU - Hansen, Dan Witzner

PY - 2016/3/14

Y1 - 2016/3/14

N2 - We investigate the gaze estimation error induced by pupil size changes using simulated data. We investigate the influence of pupil diameter changes on estimated gaze point error obtained by two gaze estimation models. Simulation data show that at wider viewing angles and at small eye-camera distances, error increases with increasing pupil sizes. The maximum error recorded for refracted pupil images is 2.4° of visual angle and 1.5° for non-refracted pupil projections.

AB - We investigate the gaze estimation error induced by pupil size changes using simulated data. We investigate the influence of pupil diameter changes on estimated gaze point error obtained by two gaze estimation models. Simulation data show that at wider viewing angles and at small eye-camera distances, error increases with increasing pupil sizes. The maximum error recorded for refracted pupil images is 2.4° of visual angle and 1.5° for non-refracted pupil projections.

KW - image processing, eye tracking, gaze estimation, pupildynamics, human computer interaction

U2 - 10.1145/2857491.2857536

DO - 10.1145/2857491.2857536

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 978-1-4503-4125-7

SP - 283

EP - 286

BT - ETRA '16 Proceedings of the Ninth Biennial ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications

PB - Association for Computing Machinery

ER -

Pupil Center as a Function of Pupil Diameter

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this