Overview of the SBS 2016 Suggestion Track

Marijn Koolen; Toine Bogers; Kamps Jaap

Overview of the SBS 2016 Suggestion Track

Marijn Koolen, Toine Bogers, Kamps Jaap

Research output: Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Abstract

The goal of the SBS 2016 Suggestion Track is to evaluate approaches for supporting users in searching collections of books who express their information needs both in a query and through example books. The track investigates the complex nature of relevance in book search and the role of traditional and user-generated book metadata in retrieval. We consolidated last year’s investigation into the nature of book suggestions from the LibraryThing forums and how they compare to book relevance judgements. Participants were encouraged to incorporate rich user profiles of both topic creators and other LibraryThing users to explore the relative value of recommendation and retrieval paradigms for book search.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Working Notes of CLEF 2016 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum
Number of pages	14
Publisher	CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Publication date	5 Sept 2016
Pages	1039-1052
Publication status	Published - 5 Sept 2016
Externally published	Yes
Event	Conference and Labs of the Evaluation forum - Évora, Portugal Duration: 5 Sept 2016 → 8 Sept 2016

Conference

Conference	Conference and Labs of the Evaluation forum
Country/Territory	Portugal
City	Évora
Period	05/09/2016 → 08/09/2016

Series	CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Volume	1609
ISSN	1613-0073

Keywords

Book Suggestion Systems
Relevance in Book Search
User-Generated Metadata
Recommendation and Retrieval Paradigms
LibraryThing User Profiles

Access to Document

Open access articleFinal published version, 397 KB

http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1609/16091039.pdfLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

@inproceedings{4f43e212c84e40d59c6ad4a4290c2ffe,

title = "Overview of the SBS 2016 Suggestion Track",

abstract = "The goal of the SBS 2016 Suggestion Track is to evaluate approaches for supporting users in searching collections of books who express their information needs both in a query and through example books. The track investigates the complex nature of relevance in book search and the role of traditional and user-generated book metadata in retrieval. We consolidated last year{\textquoteright}s investigation into the nature of book suggestions from the LibraryThing forums and how they compare to book relevance judgements. Participants were encouraged to incorporate rich user profiles of both topic creators and other LibraryThing users to explore the relative value of recommendation and retrieval paradigms for book search.",

keywords = "Book Suggestion Systems, Relevance in Book Search, User-Generated Metadata, Recommendation and Retrieval Paradigms, LibraryThing User Profiles, Book Suggestion Systems, Relevance in Book Search, User-Generated Metadata, Recommendation and Retrieval Paradigms, LibraryThing User Profiles",

author = "Marijn Koolen and Toine Bogers and Kamps Jaap",

year = "2016",

month = sep,

day = "5",

language = "English",

series = "CEUR Workshop Proceedings",

publisher = "CEUR Workshop Proceedings",

pages = "1039--1052",

booktitle = "Working Notes of CLEF 2016 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum",

note = "Conference and Labs of the Evaluation forum, CLEF ; Conference date: 05-09-2016 Through 08-09-2016",

}

Overview of the SBS 2016 Suggestion Track. / Koolen, Marijn; Bogers, Toine; Jaap, Kamps.
Working Notes of CLEF 2016 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2016. p. 1039-1052 (CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Vol. 1609).

Research output: Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapter › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Overview of the SBS 2016 Suggestion Track

AU - Koolen, Marijn

AU - Bogers, Toine

AU - Jaap, Kamps

PY - 2016/9/5

Y1 - 2016/9/5

N2 - The goal of the SBS 2016 Suggestion Track is to evaluate approaches for supporting users in searching collections of books who express their information needs both in a query and through example books. The track investigates the complex nature of relevance in book search and the role of traditional and user-generated book metadata in retrieval. We consolidated last year’s investigation into the nature of book suggestions from the LibraryThing forums and how they compare to book relevance judgements. Participants were encouraged to incorporate rich user profiles of both topic creators and other LibraryThing users to explore the relative value of recommendation and retrieval paradigms for book search.

AB - The goal of the SBS 2016 Suggestion Track is to evaluate approaches for supporting users in searching collections of books who express their information needs both in a query and through example books. The track investigates the complex nature of relevance in book search and the role of traditional and user-generated book metadata in retrieval. We consolidated last year’s investigation into the nature of book suggestions from the LibraryThing forums and how they compare to book relevance judgements. Participants were encouraged to incorporate rich user profiles of both topic creators and other LibraryThing users to explore the relative value of recommendation and retrieval paradigms for book search.

KW - Book Suggestion Systems

KW - Relevance in Book Search

KW - User-Generated Metadata

KW - Recommendation and Retrieval Paradigms

KW - LibraryThing User Profiles

KW - Book Suggestion Systems

KW - Relevance in Book Search

KW - User-Generated Metadata

KW - Recommendation and Retrieval Paradigms

KW - LibraryThing User Profiles

M3 - Article in proceedings

T3 - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

SP - 1039

EP - 1052

BT - Working Notes of CLEF 2016 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum

PB - CEUR Workshop Proceedings

T2 - Conference and Labs of the Evaluation forum

Y2 - 5 September 2016 through 8 September 2016

ER -

Overview of the SBS 2016 Suggestion Track

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this