Abstract
The rapid adoption of AI across diverse domains has led to the development of
organisational guidelines that vary significantly, even within the same sector. This
paper examines AI policies in two domains, news organisations and universities, to understand how bottom-up governance approaches shape AI usage and oversight. By analysing these policies, we identify key areas of convergence and divergence in how organisations address risks such as bias, privacy, misinformation, and accountability. We then explore the implications of these findings for AI legislation, particularly the EU AI Act, highlighting gaps where practical policy insights could inform regulatory refinements. Our analysis reveals that organisational policies often address issues such as AI literacy, disclosure practices, and environmental impact, areas that are underdeveloped in existing legislative frameworks. We argue that lessons from domain-specific AI policies can contribute to more adaptive and effective AI governance at the global level. This study provides actionable recommendations for policymakers seeking to bridge the gap between local AI
practices and regulations
organisational guidelines that vary significantly, even within the same sector. This
paper examines AI policies in two domains, news organisations and universities, to understand how bottom-up governance approaches shape AI usage and oversight. By analysing these policies, we identify key areas of convergence and divergence in how organisations address risks such as bias, privacy, misinformation, and accountability. We then explore the implications of these findings for AI legislation, particularly the EU AI Act, highlighting gaps where practical policy insights could inform regulatory refinements. Our analysis reveals that organisational policies often address issues such as AI literacy, disclosure practices, and environmental impact, areas that are underdeveloped in existing legislative frameworks. We argue that lessons from domain-specific AI policies can contribute to more adaptive and effective AI governance at the global level. This study provides actionable recommendations for policymakers seeking to bridge the gap between local AI
practices and regulations
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | NeurIPS 2025 Workshop on Regulatable ML |
| Publication date | 2025 |
| Publication status | Published - 2025 |
| Event | Regulatable ML - San Diego, United States Duration: 6 Dec 2025 → 6 Dec 2025 https://regulatableml.github.io/ |
Workshop
| Workshop | Regulatable ML |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United States |
| City | San Diego |
| Period | 06/12/2025 → 06/12/2025 |
| Internet address |
Keywords
- AI governance
- Organizational policy
- Bottom-up governance
- EU AI Act
- Domain-specific AI policies
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Local Differences, Global Lessons: Insights from Organisation Policies for Legislation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver