Inaction as a Design Decision: Reflections on Not Designing Self-Tracking Tools for Menopause

Sarah Homewood

Research output: Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapterArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This reflective essay documents an attempt to design self-tracking technologies for menopause. This process culminated in the decision to not design. The contribution of this essay is the knowledge produced through reflecting on inaction. From an investigation into current examples, it became clear that applying self-tracking to menopause was fundamentally inappropriate. These technologies were also found to risk resulting in more harm than good; both in essentializing and medicalizing a non-medical process, and in perpetuating notions of the bodily experience of the menopausal transition as a negative experience.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationExtended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Publication date18 Apr 2019
Pagesalt17
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4503-5971-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 18 Apr 2019

Keywords

  • Menopause
  • women’s health
  • reflective HCI
  • non-design
  • undesign
  • menstrual cycles

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Inaction as a Design Decision: Reflections on Not Designing Self-Tracking Tools for Menopause'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this