Abstract
Proper names of organisations are a special case of collective nouns. Their meaning can be conceptualised as a collective unit or as a plurality of persons, allowing for different morphological marking of anaphoric pronouns. This paper explores the variability of references to organisation names with 1) a corpus analysis and 2) two crowd-sourced story continuation experiments. The first shows that the preference for singular vs. plural conceptualisation is dependent on the level of formality of a text. In the second, we observe a strong preference for the plural they otherwise typical of informal speech. Using edited corpus data instead of constructed sentences as stimuli reduces this preference.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Seventh Named Entities Workshop |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Publication date | 20 Jul 2018 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-948087-37-7 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 20 Jul 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Organisation names
- Anaphora
- Plural they
- Corpus analysis
- Text formality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Forms of Anaphoric Reference to Organisational Named Entities: Hoping to widen appeal, they diversified'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver