Content Format and Quality of Experience in Virtual Reality

Henrique Galvan Debarba, Mario Montagud, Sylvain Chagué, Javier Lajara, Ignacio Lacosta, Sergi Fernandez Langa, Caecilia Charbonnier

Research output: Contribution to conference - NOT published in proceeding or journalPaperResearch


In this paper, we investigate three forms of virtual reality content production and consumption. Namely, 360 stereoscopic video, the combination of a 3D environment with a video billboard for dynamic elements, and a full 3D rendered scene. On one hand, video based techniques facilitate the acquisition of content, but they can limit the experience of the user since the content is captured from a fixed point of view. On the other hand, 3D content allows for point of view translation, but real-time photorealistic rendering is not trivial and comes at high production and processing costs. We also compare the two extremes with an approach that combines dynamic video elements with a 3D virtual environment. We discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these systems, and present the result of a user study with 24 participants. In the study, we evaluated the quality of experience, including presence, simulation sickness and participants' assessment of content quality, of three versions of a cinematic segment with two actors. We found that, in this context, mixing video and 3D content produced the best experience.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date11 Aug 2020
Number of pages25
Publication statusPublished - 11 Aug 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Content Format and Quality of Experience in Virtual Reality'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this