Composable Sketches for Functions of Frequencies: Beyond the Worst Case

Edith Cohen, Ofir Geri, Rasmus Pagh

Research output: Conference Article in Proceeding or Book/Report chapterArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Recently there has been increased interest in using machine learning techniques to improve classical algorithms. In this paper we study when it is possible to construct compact, composable sketches for weighted sampling and statistics estimation according to functions of data frequencies. Such structures are now central components of large-scale data analytics and machine learning pipelines. However, many common functions, such as thresholds and p th frequency moments with p>2 , are known to require polynomial size sketches in the worst case. We explore performance beyond the worst case under two different types of assumptions. The first is having access to noisy advice on item frequencies. This continues the line of work of Hsu et al. (ICLR 2019), who assume predictions are provided by a machine learning model. The second is providing guaranteed performance on a restricted class of input frequency distributions that are better aligned with what is observed in practice. This extends the work on heavy hitters under Zipfian distributions in a seminal paper of Charikar et al. (ICALP 2002). Surprisingly, we show analytically and empirically that "in practice" small polylogarithmic-size sketches provide accuracy for "hard" functions.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 37 th International Conference on Machine Learning
PublisherML Research Press
Publication date2020
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Keywords

  • machine learning
  • classical algorithms
  • weighted sampling
  • statistics estimation
  • data frequencies
  • compact sketches
  • large-scale data analytics
  • polylogarithmic-size sketches
  • noisy advice
  • Zipfian distributions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Composable Sketches for Functions of Frequencies: Beyond the Worst Case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this