Characteristics of Users and Nonusers of Symptom Checkers in Germany: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

Marvin Kopka, Lenhard Scatturin, Henry Napierala, Daniel Fürstenau, Markus A. Feufel, Felix Balzer, Malte L. Schmieding

Research output: Journal Article or Conference Article in JournalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Background:
Previous studies have revealed that users of symptom checkers (SCs, apps that support self-diagnosis and self-triage) are predominantly female, are younger than average, and have higher levels of formal education. Little data are available for Germany, and no study has so far compared usage patterns with people’s awareness of SCs and the perception of usefulness.

Objective:
We explored the sociodemographic and individual characteristics that are associated with the awareness, usage, and perceived usefulness of SCs in the German population.

Methods:
We conducted a cross-sectional online survey among 1084 German residents in July 2022 regarding personal characteristics and people’s awareness and usage of SCs. Using random sampling from a commercial panel, we collected participant responses stratified by gender, state of residence, income, and age to reflect the German population. We analyzed the collected data exploratively.

Results:
Of all respondents, 16.3% (177/1084) were aware of SCs and 6.5% (71/1084) had used them before. Those aware of SCs were younger (mean 38.8, SD 14.6 years, vs mean 48.3, SD 15.7 years), were more often female (107/177, 60.5%, vs 453/907, 49.9%), and had higher formal education levels (eg, 72/177, 40.7%, vs 238/907, 26.2%, with a university/college degree) than those unaware. The same observation applied to users compared to nonusers. It disappeared, however, when comparing users to nonusers who were aware of SCs. Among users, 40.8% (29/71) considered these tools useful. Those considering them useful reported higher self-efficacy (mean 4.21, SD 0.66, vs mean 3.63, SD 0.81, on a scale of 1-5) and a higher net household income (mean EUR 2591.63, SD EUR 1103.96 [mean US $2798.96, SD US $1192.28], vs mean EUR 1626.60, SD EUR 649.05 [mean US $1756.73, SD US $700.97]) than those who considered them not useful. More women considered SCs unhelpful (13/44, 29.5%) compared to men (4/26, 15.4%).

Conclusions:
Concurring with studies from other countries, our findings show associations between sociodemographic characteristics and SC usage in a German sample: users were on average younger, of higher socioeconomic status, and more commonly female compared to nonusers. However, usage cannot be explained by sociodemographic differences alone. It rather seems that sociodemographics explain who is or is not aware of the technology, but those who are aware of SCs are equally likely to use them, independently of sociodemographic differences. Although in some groups (eg, people with anxiety disorder), more participants reported to know and use SCs, they tended to perceive them as less useful. In other groups (eg, male participants), fewer respondents were aware of SCs, but those who used them perceived them to be more useful. Thus, SCs should be designed to fit specific user needs, and strategies should be developed to help reach individuals who could benefit but are not aware of SCs yet.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere46231
JournalJournal of Medical Internet Research
ISSN1439-4456
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Jun 2023

Keywords

  • Symptom Checkers
  • Digital Health
  • Cross-Sectional Study
  • Mobile health
  • health app
  • Survey
  • Adoption
  • Usage
  • Awareness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Characteristics of Users and Nonusers of Symptom Checkers in Germany: Cross-Sectional Survey Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this