Abstract
Book search for information needs that go beyond standard bibliographic data is far from a solved problem. Such complex information needs often cover a combination of di erent aspects, such as specific genres or plot elements, engagement or novelty. By design, subject information in controlled vocabularies is not always adequate in covering such complex needs, and social tags have been proposed as an alternative. In this paper we present a large-scale empirical comparison and in-depth analysis of the value of controlled vocabularies and tags for book retrieval using a test collection of over 2 million book records and over 330 real-world book information needs. We find that while tags and controlled vocabulary terms provide complementary performance, tags perform better overall. However, this is not due to a popularity e ect; instead, tags are better at matching the language of regular users. Finally, we perform a detailed failure analysis and show, using tags and controlled vocabulary terms, that some request types are inherently more di cult to solve than others.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Proceedings of iConference 2017 |
Number of pages | 16 |
Publisher | iSchools |
Publication date | 25 Mar 2017 |
ISBN (Print) | 978-0-9884900-4-8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 25 Mar 2017 |
Externally published | Yes |
Event | iConference 2017: Effect, Expand, Evolve - Wuhan, China Duration: 22 Mar 2017 → 25 Mar 2017 http://ischools.org/the-iconference/ |
Conference
Conference | iConference 2017 |
---|---|
Country/Territory | China |
City | Wuhan |
Period | 22/03/2017 → 25/03/2017 |
Internet address |
Series | iConference |
---|---|
Volume | 2 |
ISSN | 2325-6850 |
Keywords
- Book retrieval
- Information needs
- Controlled vocabularies
- Social tags
- User language matching