A cross-case analysis of technology-in-use practices: EPR-adaptation in Canada and Norway

Nina Boulus, Pernille Bjørn

    Research output: Journal Article or Conference Article in JournalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: To identify and characterize enabling factors that support a continuous adaptation of technology and work practices in the health care sector. Methods: Cross-case analysis of two longitudinal ethnographic studies of managing the gradual adaptation of electronic patient records, one in Canada and one Norway.
    Results: The cross-case analysis revealed that technology-in-use practices developed more rapidly in one of the cases, and one of the major driving forces was the establishment of a special committee and the associated project meetings. Based on the literature and grounded in the empirical observations, we complement and expand the notion of project meetings as composed of continuous reflection-on-practice activities to construct technology-in-use practices.
    Conclusion: We characterize reflection-on-practice activities as frequent encounters of negotiations of work practices and technology use, providing internal actors a space for systematic evaluation of suggested changes. Further we argue that representatives of the affected professions should not only participate, but also have a mandate to make and evaluate decisions of the technology-in-use practices of the particular group.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalInternational Journal of Medical Informatics
    Volume79
    Issue number6
    Pages (from-to)97
    Number of pages108
    ISSN1386-5056
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • Medical Record Systems
    • Computerized
    • Hospital information systems
    • Medical informatics
    • Technology adaptation
    • Techonology in-use practices
    • Qualitative research

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'A cross-case analysis of technology-in-use practices: EPR-adaptation in Canada and Norway'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this