What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review

Terne Thorn Jakobsen, Anna Rogers

    Publikation: Konference artikel i Proceeding eller bog/rapport kapitelKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningpeer review

    Abstract

    Both scientific progress and individual researcher careers depend on the quality of peer review, which in turn depends on paper-reviewer matching. Surprisingly, this problem has been mostly approached as an automated recommendation problem rather than as a matter where different stakeholders (area chairs, reviewers, authors) have accumulated experience worth taking into account. We present the results of the first survey of the NLP community, identifying common issues and perspectives on what factors should be considered by paper-reviewer matching systems. This study contributes actionable recommendations for improving future NLP conferences, and desiderata for interpretable peer review assignments.
    OriginalsprogEngelsk
    TitelProceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies
    Antal sider14
    UdgivelsesstedSeattle, United States
    ForlagAssociation for Computational Linguistics
    Publikationsdato1 jul. 2022
    Sider4810-4823
    StatusUdgivet - 1 jul. 2022

    Fingeraftryk

    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'What Factors Should Paper-Reviewer Assignments Rely On? Community Perspectives on Issues and Ideals in Conference Peer-Review'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

    Citationsformater