What Can We Do to Improve Peer Review in NLP?

Anna Rogers, Isabelle Augenstein

    Publikation: Konference artikel i Proceeding eller bog/rapport kapitelKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskningpeer review


    Peer review is our best tool for judging the quality of conference submissions, but it is becoming increasingly spurious. We argue that a part of the problem is that the reviewers and area chairs face a poorly defined task forcing apples-to-oranges comparisons. There are several potential ways forward, but the key difficulty is creating the incentives and mechanisms for their consistent implementation in the NLP community.
    TitelFindings of EMNLP
    Antal sider7
    ForlagAssociation for Computational Linguistics
    Publikationsdato1 nov. 2020
    StatusUdgivet - 1 nov. 2020


    Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'What Can We Do to Improve Peer Review in NLP?'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.