Abstract
This paper deals with the ethical dimensions of action in NieR: Automata (N:A;
PlatinumGames 2017). I begin by outlining the game, focusing primarily on three themes which find their expression on the game’s ludic and narrative levels and making a claim that N:A represents an interesting object of study which in many ways challenges our understanding of ethics and action in the context of single-player computer games. At the end of this section, I also posit the research question guiding the rest of the paper, focused on issues of player behavior and ethical value formation. In the second section of the paper, I discuss several ways in which action can be defined and structured in single-player computer games, with the aim of showing the ways in which N:A limits and guides the behavior of its player. In the next section, I introduce Espen Aarseth’s notion of the implied player (Aarseth 2007) and problematize it from a standpoint of (computer game) ethics. I then propose a parallel, complementary concept in relation to ethical and moral values, as opposed to
instrumental behavior, which I use in tandem with the notion of the implied player to answer the driving question behind the paper.
PlatinumGames 2017). I begin by outlining the game, focusing primarily on three themes which find their expression on the game’s ludic and narrative levels and making a claim that N:A represents an interesting object of study which in many ways challenges our understanding of ethics and action in the context of single-player computer games. At the end of this section, I also posit the research question guiding the rest of the paper, focused on issues of player behavior and ethical value formation. In the second section of the paper, I discuss several ways in which action can be defined and structured in single-player computer games, with the aim of showing the ways in which N:A limits and guides the behavior of its player. In the next section, I introduce Espen Aarseth’s notion of the implied player (Aarseth 2007) and problematize it from a standpoint of (computer game) ethics. I then propose a parallel, complementary concept in relation to ethical and moral values, as opposed to
instrumental behavior, which I use in tandem with the notion of the implied player to answer the driving question behind the paper.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Publikationsdato | 29 nov. 2017 |
Antal sider | 15 |
Status | Udgivet - 29 nov. 2017 |
Begivenhed | Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2017 - Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Polen Varighed: 28 nov. 2017 → 1 dec. 2017 https://gamephilosophy2017.wordpress.com/conference-program/ |
Konference
Konference | Philosophy of Computer Games Conference 2017 |
---|---|
Lokation | Jagiellonian University |
Land/Område | Polen |
By | Kraków |
Periode | 28/11/2017 → 01/12/2017 |
Internetadresse |
Emneord
- NieR: Automata
- ludoethical tension
- ethics
- existentialism
- gameplay condition
- choice