Abstract
This dissertation constitutes a reflection on two initiatives seeking to reconfigure
maternity care. One initiative sought to digitalise maternity records and included
a pilot run of an electronic maternity record in a Danish county. The other consisted of a collaboration between a maternity ward at a hospital and a group of researchers which included me. Both initiatives involved numerous seemingly
different interests that were held together and related to reconfiguring maternity
care. None of the initiatives can unequivocally be labelled a success, as neither
managed to change maternity care, at least not in the intended manner. It was,
however, an achievement to relate the different interests for a period. In this
dissertation I will elucidate the proposed changes in the initiatives as well as
expound on the manner in which they were proposed. It is argued that the different interests involved in the initiatives were not obstacles which the proposed changes should overcome, but are on the contrary necessary, as it is the alliances between the particular interests and the proposed changes that motor the initiatives. The interests were not invented through the initiatives but are formed through history. Although the two initiatives were different, some of the interests involved are exercised through the same kinds of logic. The word logic is
used in a particular sense, which is different from the philosophical discipline
bearing the same name. Rather, logic in this dissertation is about modes of acting, where different logics enable certain actions and make other actions less
likely. The three logics studied are The Logic of Centring the Citizen, Patient and Pregnant Women, The Logic of Seeking Progress through IT and The Logic of Standardising through Externalisation. Engaging with the contingent processes forming the three logics approaches the question why the particular interests managed to contribute to the initiatives. As the ambitions stated in the initiatives were not realised it is not possible portray the consequences and politics of the proposed changes without merely speculating. Although the initiatives were not successful the ambitions remained. To approach the consequences and politics of the proposed changes an experiment is instead carried out. This experiment draws on the interests involved in the initiatives and the three logics, while it constructs a conceptual frame within which three experimental designs are constructed. The consequences and the politics of the proposed changes are engaged with in laboratory manner through collaborative development of the designs and through exposing them to members of field of maternity care
maternity care. One initiative sought to digitalise maternity records and included
a pilot run of an electronic maternity record in a Danish county. The other consisted of a collaboration between a maternity ward at a hospital and a group of researchers which included me. Both initiatives involved numerous seemingly
different interests that were held together and related to reconfiguring maternity
care. None of the initiatives can unequivocally be labelled a success, as neither
managed to change maternity care, at least not in the intended manner. It was,
however, an achievement to relate the different interests for a period. In this
dissertation I will elucidate the proposed changes in the initiatives as well as
expound on the manner in which they were proposed. It is argued that the different interests involved in the initiatives were not obstacles which the proposed changes should overcome, but are on the contrary necessary, as it is the alliances between the particular interests and the proposed changes that motor the initiatives. The interests were not invented through the initiatives but are formed through history. Although the two initiatives were different, some of the interests involved are exercised through the same kinds of logic. The word logic is
used in a particular sense, which is different from the philosophical discipline
bearing the same name. Rather, logic in this dissertation is about modes of acting, where different logics enable certain actions and make other actions less
likely. The three logics studied are The Logic of Centring the Citizen, Patient and Pregnant Women, The Logic of Seeking Progress through IT and The Logic of Standardising through Externalisation. Engaging with the contingent processes forming the three logics approaches the question why the particular interests managed to contribute to the initiatives. As the ambitions stated in the initiatives were not realised it is not possible portray the consequences and politics of the proposed changes without merely speculating. Although the initiatives were not successful the ambitions remained. To approach the consequences and politics of the proposed changes an experiment is instead carried out. This experiment draws on the interests involved in the initiatives and the three logics, while it constructs a conceptual frame within which three experimental designs are constructed. The consequences and the politics of the proposed changes are engaged with in laboratory manner through collaborative development of the designs and through exposing them to members of field of maternity care
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Kvalifikation | Doktor i filosofi (ph.d.) |
Vejleder(e) |
|
Udgiver | |
Status | Udgivet - 2009 |