TY - CONF
T1 - Framing Electoral Transparency: A comparative analysis of three e-votes counting ceremonies
AU - Schürmann, Carsten
AU - Markussen, Randi
AU - Bélanger, Olivier
AU - Ronquillo, Lorena
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - This paper takes up the question of transparency in electronically enabled elections (e-voting). The principle of transparency is central to electoral governance as it provides means for electoral stakeholders to observe and ensure the integrity of an election. However, the issue of transparency in the field of e-voting has been proved to be di cult to tackle practically as well as analytically. In this paper we introduce the notion of ‘frames of transparency’ and deploy it to conduct a comparative analysis of three e-votes counting ceremonies in Norway, Estonia and Australia. We ask the question of how transparency is framed during these ceremonies, that is what features of the electronic votes counting process are made visible and what others are omitted. Our analysis reveals that e-voting ceremonies emphasizes bureaucratic and technocratic frames of transparency, while the democratic frame is the most di cult to uphold.
AB - This paper takes up the question of transparency in electronically enabled elections (e-voting). The principle of transparency is central to electoral governance as it provides means for electoral stakeholders to observe and ensure the integrity of an election. However, the issue of transparency in the field of e-voting has been proved to be di cult to tackle practically as well as analytically. In this paper we introduce the notion of ‘frames of transparency’ and deploy it to conduct a comparative analysis of three e-votes counting ceremonies in Norway, Estonia and Australia. We ask the question of how transparency is framed during these ceremonies, that is what features of the electronic votes counting process are made visible and what others are omitted. Our analysis reveals that e-voting ceremonies emphasizes bureaucratic and technocratic frames of transparency, while the democratic frame is the most di cult to uphold.
KW - E-voting
KW - Transparency
KW - Electoral Governance
KW - Frames of Transparency
KW - Comparative Analysis
KW - E-voting
KW - Transparency
KW - Electoral Governance
KW - Frames of Transparency
KW - Comparative Analysis
UR - https://wc2016.ipsa.org/events/congress/wc2016/home
UR - https://wc2016.ipsa.org/my-ipsa/events/istanbul2016/paper/comparing-decryption-ceremonies
UR - https://www.ipsa.org/sites/default/files/page/WC2016/Program/IPSA_program.pdf
M3 - Paper
ER -