TY - JOUR
T1 - De-centering the (Traditional) user: Multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems
AU - Burke, Robin
AU - Adomavicius, Gediminas
AU - Bogers, Toine
AU - Noia, Tommaso Di
AU - Kowald, Dominik
AU - Neidhardt, Julia
AU - Özgöbek, Özlem
AU - Pera, Maria Soledad
AU - Tintarev, Nava
AU - Ziegler, Jürgen
PY - 2025/9
Y1 - 2025/9
N2 - Multistakeholder recommender systems are those that account for the impacts and preferences of multiple groups of individuals, not just the end users receiving recommendations. Due to their complexity, these systems cannot be evaluated strictly by the overall utility of a single stakeholder, as is often the case of more mainstream recommender system applications. In this article, we focus our discussion on the challenges of multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved—from the range of stakeholders involved (including but not limited to providers and consumers) to the values and specific goals of each relevant stakeholder. We discuss how to move from theoretical principles to practical implementation, providing specific use case examples. Finally, we outline open research directions for the RecSys community to explore. We aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners about incorporating these complex and domain-dependent issues of evaluation in the course of designing, developing, and researching applications with multistakeholder aspects.
AB - Multistakeholder recommender systems are those that account for the impacts and preferences of multiple groups of individuals, not just the end users receiving recommendations. Due to their complexity, these systems cannot be evaluated strictly by the overall utility of a single stakeholder, as is often the case of more mainstream recommender system applications. In this article, we focus our discussion on the challenges of multistakeholder evaluation of recommender systems. We bring attention to the different aspects involved—from the range of stakeholders involved (including but not limited to providers and consumers) to the values and specific goals of each relevant stakeholder. We discuss how to move from theoretical principles to practical implementation, providing specific use case examples. Finally, we outline open research directions for the RecSys community to explore. We aim to provide guidance to researchers and practitioners about incorporating these complex and domain-dependent issues of evaluation in the course of designing, developing, and researching applications with multistakeholder aspects.
KW - recommender systems
KW - multi-stakeholder recommendation
KW - multi-stakeholder processes
KW - music recommendation
KW - job recommendation
KW - technology-enhanced learning
KW - evaluation
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103560
DO - 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103560
M3 - Journal article
SN - 1071-5819
VL - 203
JO - International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
JF - International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
IS - 103560
ER -