TY - JOUR
T1 - Automatic scatter detection in fluorescence landscapes by means of spherical principal component analysis
AU - Kotwa, Ewelina Katarzyna
AU - Jørgensen, Bo Munk
AU - Brockhoff, Per B.
AU - Frosch, Stina
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - In this paper, we introduce a new method, based on spherical principal component analysis (S‐PCA), for the identification of Rayleigh and Raman scatters in fluorescence excitation–emission data. These scatters should be found and eliminated as a prestep before fitting parallel factor analysis models to the data, in order to avoid model degeneracies. The work is inspired and based on a previous research, where scatter removal was automatic (based on a robust version of PCA called ROBPCA) and required no visual data inspection but appeared to be computationally intensive. To overcome this drawback, we implement the fast S‐PCA in the scatter identification routine. Moreover, an additional pattern interpolation step that complements the method, based on robust regression, will be applied. In this way, substantial time savings are gained, and the user's engagement is restricted to a minimum, which might be beneficial for certain applications. We conclude that the subsequent parallel factor analysis models fitted to excitation–emission data after scatter identification based on either ROBPCA or S‐PCA are comparable; however, the modified method based on S‐PCA clearly outperforms the original approach in relation to computational time.
AB - In this paper, we introduce a new method, based on spherical principal component analysis (S‐PCA), for the identification of Rayleigh and Raman scatters in fluorescence excitation–emission data. These scatters should be found and eliminated as a prestep before fitting parallel factor analysis models to the data, in order to avoid model degeneracies. The work is inspired and based on a previous research, where scatter removal was automatic (based on a robust version of PCA called ROBPCA) and required no visual data inspection but appeared to be computationally intensive. To overcome this drawback, we implement the fast S‐PCA in the scatter identification routine. Moreover, an additional pattern interpolation step that complements the method, based on robust regression, will be applied. In this way, substantial time savings are gained, and the user's engagement is restricted to a minimum, which might be beneficial for certain applications. We conclude that the subsequent parallel factor analysis models fitted to excitation–emission data after scatter identification based on either ROBPCA or S‐PCA are comparable; however, the modified method based on S‐PCA clearly outperforms the original approach in relation to computational time.
KW - Spherical Principal Component Analysis
KW - Rayleigh Scattering
KW - Raman Scattering
KW - Fluorescence Excitation-Emission Data
KW - Parallel Factor Analysis Model
KW - Spherical Principal Component Analysis
KW - Rayleigh Scattering
KW - Raman Scattering
KW - Fluorescence Excitation-Emission Data
KW - Parallel Factor Analysis Model
U2 - 10.1002/cem.2485
DO - 10.1002/cem.2485
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0886-9383
VL - 27
SP - 3
EP - 11
JO - Journal of Chemometrics
JF - Journal of Chemometrics
IS - 1-2
ER -